[Nickle]Union values

[Keith Packard]

Around 22 o'clock on Jul 26, Carl Worth wrote:

>  > 	(u) { i = 10 }
> 
> That's not bad. I'd take that even though it does require a couple of
> extra characters.

But you'd rather use the union constructor style instead, right?

	u.i (10)

I'm currently digging out of a horrible mess inside the type system 
relating to using 0 as a generic pointer and an integer.  I'm deleting a 
lot of code...

Keith Packard        XFree86 Core Team        HP Cambridge Research Lab