[Nickle]Union values

[Carl Worth]

On Jul 26, Keith Packard wrote:
 > Around 22 o'clock on Jul 26, Carl Worth wrote:
 > 
 > >  > 	(u) { i = 10 }
 > > 
 > > That's not bad. I'd take that even though it does require a couple of
 > > extra characters.
 > 
 > But you'd rather use the union constructor style instead, right?
 > 
 > 	u.i (10)

I'm not so sure. Now it looks like a "member function" for an object
-- icky.

 > I'm currently digging out of a horrible mess inside the type system 
 > relating to using 0 as a generic pointer and an integer.  I'm deleting a 
 > lot of code...

We must be doing something right then. Fun. :)

-Carl

-- 
Carl Worth                                        
USC Information Sciences Institute                 cworth@east.isi.edu
3811 N. Fairfax Dr. #200, Arlington VA 22203		  703-812-3725