[Calypso] creating a calendar
agx at sigxcpu.org
Tue Feb 9 22:19:36 PST 2016
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 09:16:42PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooĳ wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:27:54AM +0100, chrysn wrote:
> > i might be missing something trivial, but i actually do wonder how
> > creation of a new calendar should go about.
> > when i follow the instructions in the README and then open up davdroid
> > on it, /private/test presents itself as an address book. sure, were i to
> > open /provate/test in a client that does not rely on auto-discovery that
> > much, things would work out, but not with davdroid.
> > (i'm not sure whether it would detect the type correctly if items were
> > to be present, but we can't assume that to be the case for new setups).
> > my patch queue contains patches that (in a first patch) only report
> > D:resourcetype C:calendar or A:addressbook (and not both) when davdroid
> > detects a particular use case, and (in a second patch) adds support for
> > per-collection .calypso-collection config files that allow setting that
> > behavior.
> THere is already such a setting called 'is-calendar'.
> E.g. my calendar collection contains the following .calypso-collection
> configuration file:
> # Advertise this collection as a calendar. If this setting is absent,
> # the
> # collection's content is inspected for a guess.
> is-calendar = True
> # Advertise this collection as an address book. Behaves in analogy to
> # is-calendar.
> is-addressbook = False
> It looks like the patch I'm using that added this support was written
> by you back in 2014:
> commit 69726bcb92a7aad177eb3af3cae1aa3302347a63
> Author: chrysn <chrysn at fsfe.org>
> Date: Fri Apr 4 13:24:40 2014 +0200
> add per-collection configuration
> this is necessary to support empty calendars/address books
> with clients
> that rely on autodiscovery.
> pre-existing collections need per-coll
I don't think that one ever made it mainline at least I can't find it in
More information about the Calypso