[Nickle] Failing to build nickle 2.101

[Michel Lind]

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 02:28:59PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> 
> > It turns out -- thanks to your mention of bc ... that bc was not in the list
> > of build requirements, and the build process did not fail (nor configure verifies
> > that bc is installed) but just generates an invalid file instead.
> 
> Ah, that'll be the problem them.
> 
> > Probably worth fixing!
> 
> Yup. Note that I've added support for 'meson' and will replace autotools
> at some point. I'll make sure 'bc' is auto-detected with that.
> 
Oh, great. I much prefer meson to autotools anyway; I'll switch over the
next time I update the Fedora package

Thanks,

-- 
 _o) Michel Lind
_( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://keithp.com/pipermail/nickle/attachments/20241031/23dc75fd/attachment-0001.sig>