[Nickle] User trap revisited---setjmp() at top level

[Keith Packard]

On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 17:37 -0800, nickle at po8.org wrote:

> I think it should be possible to make setjmp() throw an
> exception when called at top level, no?  And isn't this what
> is wanted, given that it's going to behave in such a
> surprising fashion?

that would be trivial, but not exactly a complete fix, any call sequence
which terminates in setjmp and then exits back out the top has precisely
the same issue.
  

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : /pipermail/nickle/attachments/20060212/045aa57b/attachment.pgp