[Nickle] User trap revisited---setjmp() at top level
keithp at keithp.com
Sun Feb 12 19:02:27 PST 2006
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 17:37 -0800, nickle at po8.org wrote:
> I think it should be possible to make setjmp() throw an
> exception when called at top level, no? And isn't this what
> is wanted, given that it's going to behave in such a
> surprising fashion?
that would be trivial, but not exactly a complete fix, any call sequence
which terminates in setjmp and then exits back out the top has precisely
the same issue.
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : /pipermail/nickle/attachments/20060212/045aa57b/attachment.pgp
More information about the Nickle