[Nickle] Bug: reference addition bounds check on arrays
Keith Packard
keithp at keithp.com
Sat Jan 15 15:17:07 PST 2005
Around 13 o'clock on Jan 15, "Bart Massey" wrote:
> Trying to get the subarray starting at k. Maybe I can't do that.
You made me get rid of array indexing on pointers...
You can, however, do:
> int[10] a = { [i] = i };
> *int ap = &a[3];
> ap
&3
> *(ap + 1)
4
>
If you want re-indexable arrays, there's a bit of work to do. I don't
think it's impossible...
-keith
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/nickle/attachments/20050115/85c63eff/attachment.pgp
More information about the Nickle
mailing list