[Nickle] Re: Bug or misunderstanding

Keith Packard keithp at keithp.com
Mon Nov 22 18:26:30 PST 2004

Around 15 o'clock on Nov 22, Jeremy Greenwald wrote:

> Why is the size in the first dimension stored in the second element and
> the size in the second dimension stored in the first element returned by
> dims?  I would expect the numbers returned by dims to be in the same order
> as they were in the declaration/initializer.

Oh.  That does look broken.  Setdims takes the arguments in the other 
order.  One would think these would be symmetrical.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/nickle/attachments/20041122/771e3993/attachment.pgp

More information about the Nickle mailing list