[Nickle] Re: Bug or misunderstanding
keithp at keithp.com
Mon Nov 22 18:26:30 PST 2004
Around 15 o'clock on Nov 22, Jeremy Greenwald wrote:
> Why is the size in the first dimension stored in the second element and
> the size in the second dimension stored in the first element returned by
> dims? I would expect the numbers returned by dims to be in the same order
> as they were in the declaration/initializer.
Oh. That does look broken. Setdims takes the arguments in the other
order. One would think these would be symmetrical.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/nickle/attachments/20041122/771e3993/attachment.pgp
More information about the Nickle